Centives

  • Home
  • About
  • Contributors
  • Extras
    • Baseball Player Value Calculator
    • Monopoly Property Value Calculators
      • Advanced Monopoly Property Value Calculator
      • Basic Monopoly Property Value Calculator
      • Monopoly Property List
    • Pizza Topping Markup Calculator
  • Greatest Hits

Blog

Search Results

How Netflix Guaranteed House Of Cards’ Success

12:00 pm in Daily Bulletin

Netflix’s House of Cards has been a hit. This wasn’t a surprise to Netflix executives writes David Carr:

  • Netflix has access to a lot of data. It monitors when people play, pause, rewind, and forward media. They also track the time of day that people do this and the device they do it on.
  • The online streaming company noted that films directed by Mr. Fincher were popular; that Kevin Spacey’s films did well, and that people were fond of a British 90s TV show called House of Cards. These elements then went on to make Netflix’s own hit series.
  • But the use of data didn’t stop there. Netflix altered its advertising strategy based on the audience. Kevin Spacey fans saw Kevin Spacey centric ads. Those fond of female characters saw trailers focused on them.

Read more about the ethics of Netflix’s practice, why this might be a threat to creative freedom, and other bits of analytics about House of Cards over here.

Source: The New York Times

Comments Off on How Netflix Guaranteed House Of Cards’ Success

The Economics Of House Of Cards

9:00 am in Daily Bulletin

If you’re anything like us you spent a good part of the week making your way through Netflix’s latest House of Cards. Rebecca Greenfield looked at the economics of the show:

  • The show costs Netflix about $50 million a season to produce.
  • Netflix intends to have five new shows of a similar scale every year.
  • Yet most of its revenue comes from people paying $7.99 a month for a streaming subscription. It doesn’t use ads to top up that revenue.
  • If Netflix wants to recoup the costs of producing the shows then the shows need to attract 2.6 million new individuals who subscribe for two years.
  • Yet for Netflix this would be an increase of less than 10%. Last year Netflix increased its US membership by about 13%.

Read more about the dynamics of Netflix’s big bet over here.

Source: The Atlantic

Comments Off on The Economics Of House Of Cards

Why All The Best Shows Start Next Month

9:00 am in Daily Bulletin

Veep. Silicon Valley. Archer. Prison Break. The Americans. And, at least in past years, Game of Thrones. Some of the best television starts airing in April. Todd VanDerWerff explained why:

  • To qualify for the Emmy awards, half a show’s season must have aired before May 31st, and the entire season must be complete by the time of nominations in June.
  • By airing in April shows ensure that they just about make the requirements – while remaining fresh in the minds of award voters.
  • Channels like Netflix – which release all their episodes in one batch – normally have their prestige shows come out in May for the same reason.
  • This explains why House of Cards will see its entire season become available on May 30th – a day before the deadline for Emmy contention.
  • For the first time since its debut Game of Thrones won’t air until the summer, and so won’t be eligible for the 2017 Emmys. This has left the field for some awards wide open.

Read more on Vox.

Comments Off on Why All The Best Shows Start Next Month

Are Netflix Shows Successful?

9:00 am in Daily Bulletin

How many people have actually watched Netflix’s House of Cards or Orange is the New Black? It turns out, Jason Lynch writes, that we don’t know:

  • Netflix is in a better position than most other content creators to track exactly how many individuals watch each show.
  • Yet it doesn’t ever release the numbers. We know, for example, that House of Cards is popular but we don’t know how its viewership compares to other TV shows.
  • This is in part because Netflix doesn’t want its show producers or stars to know how popular they are. If they did then they could demand substantial pay hikes in the future.
  • Netflix also points out that given that they don’t have advertizers they don’t need to release such metrics to try to lure commercial partners.
  • Yet other networks such as HBO have kept a running tally of their show viewership, even though they don’t have adverts either.
  • What we do know is that Netflix has about 47 million subscribers. How many of them watch Netflix’s shows is anyone’s guess.

Read more about this over here.

Source: Quartz

Comments Off on Are Netflix Shows Successful?

The Future Of Television

9:00 am in Daily Bulletin

Today, February 1st, 2013 is the day when Netflix released the entire first season of House of Cards for subscribers to watch online. In the future we might look back at this day as the day when television’s next transformation began writes The Economist:

  • Netflix as well as other online video providers such as Hulu and Amazon are increasingly producing their own professional television content to air on their streaming services rather than on traditional cable channels.
  • They are doing this because it’s exceedingly expensive for them to acquire the rights to stream movies owned by other companies. By producing and streaming their own content they have a handle on costs.
  • The video streaming sites also need a way to differentiate themselves from one another and having their own proprietary content is the best way to do this.
  • Netflix is getting creative. Rather than follow the weekly episodic release cycle, it has instead released the entire first season because telemetric data suggests that people prefer ‘binging’ on TV shows.

Read more about what House of Cards means for television over here. As a PSA The Verge is reporting that owners of an Xbox will not be required to have signed up for Xbox gold to watch the series this weekend.

Source: The Economist

Comments Off on The Future Of Television

How Casinos Get You

9:00 am in Daily Bulletin

Over at Vox Brad Plumer wrote an exceptionally good article about how casinos get players to play for extended periods:

  • Casinos are designed so that guests don’t have to turn at 90 degree angles – doing so activates decision making sections of the brain, and they don’t want that.
  • Slots are now responsible for up to 85% of a casino’s profits. Regulators have encouraged them as a cheap source of tax revenue in challenging economic times, without the negative stigmas associated with other types of gambling such as poker.
  • Technological advances have let casinos better manipulate human emotions through slots. They used to be all or nothing machines, but these days the machine can give you 30 cents back if you play for a dollar – the brain registers such “partial wins” as real wins.
  • Gambling houses these days come with ergonomic seats that don’t cut off circulation and allow players to stay seated for hours.
  • They also design seats so that buttons are as close to the player as possible, requiring very little movement of them.
  • Casinos have learnt that having players feed coins into machines gives them time to think. Instead they encourage the use of cards with magnetic stripes, so the money being lost seems less real.
  • The stereotypical gambler in Las Vegas is now a 35 year old mother of two.

Read how casinos use food to retain your attention, why some players are irritated when they win the jackpot, how machines skirt the edge of the law by making adjustments to the volatility of machines based on your mood and much more over here.

Source: Vox

Comments Off on How Casinos Get You

Why You Should Send Us All Your Cash

12:00 pm in Daily Bulletin

Tim Fernholz hates cash – though our requests for him to send us his have gone unanswered. Here’s his rationale:

  • Cash encourages robbery – since stealing that is more or less untraceable while stolen credit cards will eventually be tracked. About $500 million in cash is robbed each year.
  • Cash also spreads disease through all the different people that handle it.
  • People lose 5.6 hours a year trying to withdraw cash – and spend $8 billion in ATM fees in the process.
  • Cash hurts poor people the most since they use it the most and have to pay the most to withdraw and manage it.
  • Businesses have to sort cash and securely transport it to banks. This costs $40 billion a year – or 1% of total revenues.
  • Since cash is difficult to trace the government loses up to $500 billion in tax revenue each year. It also spends $1.5 billion printing and distributing currency.
  • Ultimately the use of cash costs each household, on average, $1,739 in the United States.

Check out the effects that cash has on monetary policy, how European governments are cracking down on cash and more over here.

Source: Quartz

Comments Off on Why You Should Send Us All Your Cash

The Biggest Biometric Program in History

9:00 am in Daily Bulletin

India is currently spending billions of rupees on a new Unique Identification System for its citizens. The system aims to give all Indians a unique 12 digit number that they can use to access government and private services. Wired went to India to find out more about the system and its progress. Some of the highlights of their extensive analysis include:

  • The government is recording both finger prints and retina scans. By itself finger prints would only have a 95% accuracy. By combining the two the system has a 99% accuracy. Moreover certain Indians have had their finger prints rubbed away by years of hard labour, and finger prints are inadequate for children whose prints are still developing. Iris scans face none of these drawbacks. The bigger challenge though may be human error while inputting data. One study places this error rate at 4.2%. At the moment identity cards are not being issued, instead an individual’s retinas or finger prints should serve as adequate identification.
  • Less than half of Indian households have a bank account, and hold their money in cash instead. This means that this money is not being invested in the country’s growth, nor is it earning interest for the individuals. Transferring that money into bank accounts would inject billions of dollars into the capital system. The designers of the new system hope that it will encourage Indians to open up bank accounts as their identities can now easily be verified. Systems are even being put into place to verify identity via mobile phone apps, allowing individuals to withdraw money from their accounts without ever having to visit a branch that might be miles away.
  • The creators of the system want to make it an open database that any company can use to validate somebody’s identity including schools, airlines and other institutions. But this openness comes with severe risks. As hard as the designers are working to make it a secure system with multiple state of the art safeguards they note that “there’s no lock in the world that can’t be broken.” But they also point out that credit card numbers are stolen all the time and those are still widely used.
  • The system is called “Aadhaar” which means foundation. It is run on India’s cell phone network and the government is massively expanding investments into the broadband system so that it is capable of dealing with the 100 million requests per day that the system is meant to eventually deal with.

Find out more about the logistical hurdles both technical and administrative as well as the implications for security and civil liberties over here.

Source: Wired

1 Comment »

Search

Random entries

  • US Retail Sales Numbers Do Not Live up to Expectations
  • Why Economic Growth May Be Key To Saving The Environment
  • The Economics Of SkyMall Magazine
  • The Economics Of Sex Trafficking
  • The Economics Of Celebrities Hiring Celebrities

Stay in Touch

Twitter

Facebook

Email

RSS Centives RSS

  • Surge Pricing Comes To The Restaurant Industry
  • People Are Using Ubers Instead Of Ambulances
  • Why Have A President When You Can Have A Monarch?
  • The Economics Of A Las Vegas Residency
  • Silicon Valley Companies Are So Full Of Men, Women Had To Be Hired For The Holiday Parties
  • What Office Chairs Say About Our World
  • There Are Olympics For Valets
  • Eliminating The Penny Could Hurt The Poor

Join the Discussion! (No Signup Required)

  • Brian Morgan on Advanced Monopoly Property Value Calculator
  • Anonymous on Is Batman Keeping Gotham City Poor?
  • fish on Forrest Gump’s Running Route
  • Anonymous on How Much Does It Cost To Host The Hunger Games?
  • Rora on How Much Would It Cost To Build The Death Star?

Please Support Our Sponsors

What We Read

  • Cracked
  • Freakonomics
  • Marginal Revolution
  • Newmark's Door
  • Salon
  • Slate
  • The Economist
  • Wired

Categories

  • Announcement
  • Daily Bulletin
  • Editorial
  • Signature
  • Snips
  • Top

It would help us immensely if you checked out their products:



Centives is proudly powered by WordPress and BuddyPress. Just another WordPress Theme developed by Themekraft.
  • Camisetas de fútbol
  • cheap nfl jerseys
  • cheap jerseys from china
  • cheap nhl jerseys