The History Of The Swiss Army Knife

May 18, 2012 in Daily Bulletin

James Melik reviewed some of the history behind Switzerland’s most iconic product. Highlights include:

  • The Swiss Army Knife was first patented over a hundred years ago in 1897.
  • The company behind the knife makes 35,000 each day.
  • In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks pocket knives were banned from airplanes. This caused sales of Swiss Army Knives to plummet by 30%.
  • To deal with this the company released a ‘flight version’ of their product – it features no blades but has all the other functions.
  • More recent innovations include an army knife with a USB stick.

To read more about the countries that the company currently supplies, how they feel about the Chinese market, how the company, Victorinox, got its name, and why they have never made a worker redundant for financial reasons, click here.

Source: BBC

How Much Is Your Facebook Profile Worth?

May 17, 2012 in Daily Bulletin

If the product you’re using is free, the old adage goes, then you are the product. The BBC reports that Facebook has set its share price at $38 per share. Why would investors be willing to pay so much for it? Because it is by far the largest social network – there are 901 million users which make Facebook a high value product. CNN reports that if all of Facebook’s employees and executives exercise their share options then there will be about 2.8 billion shares of Facebook. At $38 each this means that Facebook will have a total worth of 106,400,000,000 – One hundred six billion and four hundred million.

Divide that among the users and your Facebook profile is worth $118.09. Tragically, we’re told that our banal stories about our pets are still worth nothing.

Are Politicians Really That Corrupt?

May 17, 2012 in Daily Bulletin, Signature

Ray Fisman* reports that data from India suggests that politicians aren’t as corrupt as they are commonly believed to be. Highlights from his study include:

  • On average the wealth of an elected politician grows by 6% relative to the runner-up that they beat.
  • This can add up: after five years this means an additional $60,000 in wealth.
  • This is more than the few thousand dollars that politicians can expect to earn through their salary. But in absolute terms the figure is much lower than one would expect.
  • Those who are appointed to cabinet level posts truly benefit. Their wealth increases by 15% compared to those who lost against them.
  • However to be appointed to a cabinet level position requires you to be intelligent and skilled – the very qualities that are likely to lead to a higher income in the first place.
  • Politicians who come from the private sector and are re-elected actually see their income grow by less than their opponent.

To read more about why this paints a fairly benign picture of Indian corruption, some potential deficiencies in the study, why this study was possible, the methodology behind it, and what happens to the wealth of incumbents, click here.

Source: Slate

Via: Freakonomics

*Centives incorrectly spelled Mr. Fisman’s name as “Ray Fishman”. Apologies for the error and thanks to T. Fitch for pointing this out.

The Economics of Kidnapping

May 17, 2012 in Daily Bulletin

http://www.aeroplanes.com/travel/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/kidnap.jpg

Megan McArdle applied economic theory to kidnapping and came up with the following conclusions:

  • Hostage negotiations are ‘bilateral monopoly price negotiations.’ There is just one seller (the kidnapper) and one buyer (the hostage’s loved ones.)
  • In such a market two things determine price: willingness to accept failure and capacity to pay.
  • The party that is more willing to accept failure – that is an inability to mutually agree upon the worth of the hostage – has more bargaining power.
  • Those who are able to pay more have less bargaining power. This is likely why Filipinos are significantly cheaper to ransom than Europeans.
  • What shouldn’t matter is the established ‘market-price’ for a hostage. In such a situation there is no established market – there is just a series of one-off transactions.

To read more about deviations from this model, what this has to say about economics as a whole, how this relates to Somali pirates, and the mistake that both Caesar and his kidnappers made, click here.

Source: The Atlantic

How Yahoo Killed Flickr

May 16, 2012 in Daily Bulletin

Today if you want to share photos you go to Facebook, and if you want to upload and store them you use Dropbox or SkyDrive writes Mat Honan. But it didn’t always used to be this way – at one point Flickr was the place to achieve all those tasks. Then Yahoo bought Flickr and “murdered it and screwed itself out of relevance along the way.” Here’s how:

  • When Yahoo purchased Flickr it focused on integrating it into Yahoo’s ecosystem rather than developing new products or features. This alienated the site’s prior fan base. At one point it required all Flickr users to abandon their old accounts and adopt Yahoo accounts.
  • Moreover Yahoo spent too much time trying to monetize Flickr’s sophisticated image index.
  • Yahoo had all the pieces in place to dominate social on the web – but it never put them together and now Facebook is a behemoth that Yahoo can’t compete with.
  • Yahoo also missed the boat on mobile. It took a long time for Flickr apps to be released, and to this day the apps are slow, ineffectual, and lack basic features.
  • Today Yahoo is trying to right past wrongs and is trying to take Flickr in the right direction. However the road ahead is difficult and Yahoo’s future itself is mired in uncertainty. The best outcome might be for Yahoo to spin Flickr off or sell it to somebody else.

To read more of what is an extensive analysis not only of Flickr but of Yahoo and the recent history of the web as a whole, and to find out how this all relates to cats with laser eyes, as well as some choice anecdotes and quotes, click here.

Source: Gizmodo

A Stick-Shift Resurgence?

May 16, 2012 in Daily Bulletin

James R. Healey discussed numbers that suggest we might see a resurgence of manual cars:

  • In the first quarter of 2012 manual cars were 6.5% of new cars sold. This is double what the rate has been in the past five years.
  • This is all the more impressive because only 19% of the available cars had a manual gear shift as an option.
  • The typical argument in favour of clutch pedal cars is that they save on fuel consumption. However that is no longer true – today’s embedded computers ensure that automatic cars are just as fuel efficient if not more so.
  • Part of the appeal of manual cars is that they can be thousands of dollars cheaper.
  • In certain types of cars it is easiest to get most power from a manual transmission.

To read other reasons for the rise in the sales of manual cars, including the role of habit and user-friendliness, as well as to find out what Ford’s Focus marketing manager has to say about the phenomenon, or to take a look at the expanded numbers click here.

Source: USA Today

Via: Salon

Why Do Mormons Make Such Great Businessmen?

May 15, 2012 in Daily Bulletin

It appears that Mitt Romney’s Mormon roots and business credentials are going to be scrutinized closely in the 2012 elections. What’s the link between Mormonism and business? Schumpeter highlighted:

  • Less than 2% of the United States’ population is Mormon, yet Mormons have created some of the most notable companies in the country. They include Romney’s own Bain Capital as well as JetBlue, Credit Suisse’s Investment arm and Marriott hotels.
  • Their success is likely in part due to their clean living. Mormons do not consume alcohol or drugs which means that their judgment is rarely ever clouded.
  • A history of persecution has also made Mormons more self-reliant.
  • As the only global religion to have been created in the past 200 years, it is more oriented towards, and comfortable with, business than other religions.
  • Even their conceptualization of God involves order and organization.
  • The Mormon church itself is well run with estimates of its revenue running into the billions.

To read more about the organization structure of the Mormon church, other notable Mormons, the mission that all Mormons must undertake, and why Mormonism is one of the three “Ms” at Harvard business school, click here.

Source: The Economist

Asia’s Hotel Boom

May 15, 2012 in Daily Bulletin

Nick Easen reported on the growing Asian hotel boom. Highlights included:

  • The 50 hotels that the brand owner of Westin and Sheraton will open in Asia this year represents 60% of the business’s development in 2012.
  • By the end of 2013 one Chinese island will have more hotels than the Hawaiian islands.
  • China’s hotel market is predicted to be double that of the United States by 2039.
  • Marriott is planning to go from 11 hotels in India to 100 in just five years.
  • The hotel chains are hoping to create brand loyalty in the next generation of international travels.
  • However one of the challenges is finding experienced employees – most are young and new and are working in the hotel industry for the first time.

To read more about what the United Nations World Travel Organisation has to say, what will happen in 2025, the role that Baku, Colombo, and Dhaka have to play, and how domestic brands in these countries are stepping up their game, click here.

Source: BBC News

The New Yorker Film Curse?

May 14, 2012 in Daily Bulletin, Signature

http://www.elmulticine.com/imagenes/artistas/georgeclooney_b.jpg

Alec Nevala-Lee has noticed a fascinating trend. After The New Yorker publishes a profile of somebody in the Hollywood industry, their careers almost always take a turn for the worst. Highlights from the article include:

  • Last year director Andrew Stanton had a long, positive piece written about him in the magazine. His movie John Carter, released just six months later, is among the costliest flops in Hollywood history.
  • Others who have fallen prey to the effect include George Clooney and Steve Carell.
  • This might be because of what in finance is called ‘performance chasing.’ The New Yorker only runs profiles of the most successful – likely right after they’ve had a big hit. But such success cannot be maintained indefinitely and artists will eventually return to their performance mean.
  • The effect might also be because The New Yorker is forced to tie its profiles into a wider theme – since it publishes so few of them a year. These themes attempt to project into the future of entire industries and they almost always get it wrong.

To read more about those who have fallen to the curse, how this relates to Sports Illustrated, why Armando Iannucci should be worried, the one exception to the rule in recent times, and why the New Yorker can’t focus on emerging talent, click here.

Source: Salon

Should We Abolish Medical Conferences?

May 14, 2012 in Daily Bulletin, Signature

In theory medical conferences “aim to disseminate and advance research, train, educate, and set evidence-based policy” yet John P. A. Ioannidis argues that they should be abolished. Here’s why:

  • Travelling to the conference imparts significant environmental costs. One estimate suggests that each mid-sized conference produces 10,000 tons of carbon.
  • The conferences create a branding system where those with high reputations get more attention. But this might mean that attention is given to those that know how to effectively navigate power circles rather than those that produce the best research.
  • The information disseminated is often not properly peer reviewed and instead the conference is used by participants to pad resumes.
  • Medical conferences may go extinct on their own: if physicians no longer pay attention, if people no longer attend, and if they no longer receive funding then they will naturally die out.
  • A better alternative would include small, focused groups of experts.

To read about the “virtual online late-breaker portal” that could be created to replace some of the functions of conferences, why medical conferences might discourage young researchers from focusing on what counts, the questionable peer review that takes place at these conferences, and how the issue of conflicts of interest is dealt with at these conferences, click here.

Source: JAMA

Via: Chris Blattman, Common Health